Rate control was more cost-effective than rhythm control in persistent atrial fibrillation.
نویسنده
چکیده
Intervention: rate control (n = 256) or rhythm control (n = 266). Rate control included use of digitalis, a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, and a b blocker, alone or in combination. Target resting heart rate was ,100 beats/minute. Patients in the rhythm control group received serial electrical cardioversion and serial antiarrhythmic drugs using sotalol, 160– 320 mg/day, as the first choice, followed by class IC antiarrhythmic drugs, with amiodarone used as the last choice.
منابع مشابه
Cost-effectiveness of rhythm versus rate control in atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is the most common type of sustained cardiac arrhythmia, but recent trials have identified no clear advantage of rhythm control over rate control. Consequently, economic factors often play a role in guiding treatment selection. OBJECTIVE To estimate the cost-effectiveness of rhythm-control versus rate-control strategies for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial Fibr...
متن کاملRecent advances in rhythm control for atrial fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a difficult management problem. The restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm-rhythm control therapy-can markedly improve symptoms and haemodynamics for patients who have paroxysmal or persistent AF, but some patients fare well with rate control alone. Sinus rhythm can be achieved with anti-arrhythmic drugs or electrical cardioversion, but the maintenance of s...
متن کاملEffect of rate or rhythm control on quality of life in persistent atrial fibrillation. Results from the Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) Study.
OBJECTIVES We studied the influence of rate control or rhythm control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) on quality of life (QoL). BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation may cause symptoms like fatigue and dyspnea. This can impair QoL. Treatment of AF with either rate or rhythm control may influence QoL. METHOD Quality of life was assessed in patients included in the Rate Control ...
متن کاملA comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND Maintenance of sinus rhythm is the main therapeutic goal in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, recurrences of atrial fibrillation and side effects of antiarrhythmic drugs offset the benefits of sinus rhythm. We hypothesized that ventricular rate control is not inferior to the maintenance of sinus rhythm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. METHODS We randomly assigned...
متن کاملCost-effectiveness of cardioversion and antiarrhythmic therapy in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND Physicians managing patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation must consider the risks, benefits, and costs of treatments designed to restore and maintain sinus rhythm compared with those of rate control with antithrombotic prophylaxis. OBJECTIVE To compare the cost-effectiveness of cardioversion, with or without antiarrhythmic agents, with that of rate control plus warfarin or ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- ACP journal club
دوره 142 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005